Remington Society

317556 - the one with the ejector hammer issue - the ejectors do not work. No I haven't dry fired it with the forend off - but in 100+ years who knows if it has been? Do you suspect that may have caused the issue or indicative of something you've seen before? Q392551 nicely ejects a dummy round on t...

Pictures of Q392551 have been uploaded to http://s1062.photobucket.com/user/mtsylvia/library/Remington%201900%2028 I am in the Cincinnati area - and yes I agree , I want them both to be fixed and made ready by a professional if possible. They both have survived exceedingly well. If they could only t...

Thx for the ebay auction tip - looking into it!

I have uploaded a complete set of photos for Number 317956 for those with interest.

http://s1062.photobucket.com/user/mtsyl ... %2030%20in

Must be ejectors if it is split like this?

317956 after removng forend - released forward

I also am thinking this is a ejector model as taking apart the two forends I see no difference in the way they are made with the springs and pair of "ears" that would bear against the ejectors - both are split as you would expect ejectors to be in the barrels. So I may have the exception h...

Few more things to add I measured the chokes thus +- .001 # 31756 right .696 left .694 I also now see and no idea how I missed it markings for the shot count as 37 over 33 Q392551 right .708 left .710 so this bodes well with the IM sizing - the barrels do not appear to have been cut thankfully. MY b...

I'm new to the 1900 world, but shooting muzzloader shotguns for - well - quite a while. I have been reading many of the posts here and want to add my two to the knowledge base, and ask a few questions. Thanks to Researcher for a lot of the knowledge I have gleaned so far. I'm looking into getting th...